In my opinion, social media and the internet make journalists lazy. Instead of contacting sources, researching information and conducting investigations, some journalists use tweets to back up their stories inappropriately. For example, in the Tucson shooting, a tweet mistakenly stated that Representative Gabrielle Giffords was dead, and the false news spread quickly.
This video is another example of the impacts of social media on journalism. Dwayne Wade, who is locked in the bathroom, uploads a video online that says “get me out.” This message mobilizes the news and everyone thinks he wants to trade out of the Miami Heat. These short posts are often said without context and cause misrepresentations of situations.
I think that Twitter, Facebook and Blogs could be used to inspire story ideas that readers care about. A journalist can look at these outlets to see what topics are popular and what subject needs to be investigated further. They should be used as tip generators
These websites bring up concerns regarding accuracy, credibility, fairness and balance. Who writes the information on these websites? Can they be trusted?
Reporters and editors should follow the same guidelines when dealing with print or web material. Anything a reporter uses from a social media website needs to be verified. He or she must do the math and check every fact, even if it comes from an official source. Accuracy leads to credibility and that is the most important value of an organization. Editors should use proper AP style online and examine the details and context of the information. Subscribing to the AP style website could facilitate the process of checking the material. Running fact checks in websites such as Poligraft could also help detect any discrepancies.
Editors must especially use their common sense and logic when dealing with online material because it is often taken out of context. They should always ask themselves: Does this information make sense?